Some of all of our foregoing factors offer credence towards the assertion you to metaphor is actually a keen analogous title. This is substantiated by St Thomas’ processes concerned 13 away from the newest Prima Pars , because when you look at the post around three, when he requires or no name is said safely out of Jesus, the fresh new resistance delivered towards gamble try between use proprie and you can improprie to the second understood with metaphor. After that, into the post half dozen, when he asks in the event the brands well-known in order to Jesus and creatures are first told you of animals, the brand new differences proprie/improprie appears to be a subdivision away from analogous name. St Thomas starts because of the stating that “inside omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for every respectum post unum: et ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur during the definitione omnium. Et quia ratio quam significat nomen for every single prius dicitur de eo quod ponitur in definitione aliorum, mais aussi per posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant advertisement illud primum vel magis vel minus.” This might be exemplified by old credible, “match.” “Sic thus omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur for each and every prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de Deo: quia dicta de- Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines post tales creaturas.” St. Thomas observes the latest similarity out-of proportion ( similitudo proportionum ) meant inside “smiling meadow” along with getting in touch with Goodness a lion.
When he continues on to speak regarding other brands “quae non metaphorice dicuntur de Deo,” the fresh new clear impact is the fact he or she is talking regarding almost every other era away from analogous labels than metaphors
Are there texts in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and you can example? When we turn to the fresh feedback with the Metaphysics , we find St Thomas identifying “potency” with the analogous and you will equivocal modes. “Potency” means a number of things. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum offer quosdam analogiae.” The newest equivocal methods out of efficiency was exemplified by-the-way we talk about step 3 on 3rd strength as well as the fresh cube due to the fact electricity of your own range. “Et propter hoc for every single quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens within the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens into the rem” Once again good proportionality notice. These particular equivocal settings really are metaphors is pay someone to write my essay obvious regarding the synchronous passing in book Delta from inside the posting comments on what St Thomas initiate, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” What makes these types of methods metaphorical and not analogical? “His thus modis praetermissis, considerandum est de- potentiis, quae reducuntur ad unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, et omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur ad aliquid principium ex quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In a nutshell, St Thomas here opposes metaphor in order to analogous spends off a reputation as second and never the former involve a reduction to what is mainly denominated of the word at issue whereas, should it you desire mentioning, on text message of the Summa i felt an additional in the past, this new metaphor was not known on extension proprie with this base. Or perhaps is it the way of your regard to what exactly is principally signifed from the name and this distinguishes metaphor out-of analogy, incorporate proprie out of improprie ? Anything named metaphorically is actually, whatsoever, taken to become similar to precisely what the term properly represents.
That which we will be selecting is a few technique for justifying this new fairly preferred huge difference away from metaphor and example in a fashion that zero interest is designed to Cajetan’s division out-of analogy towards attribution and you can proper proportionality
A keen aporia has actually obviously emerged, therefore, and its particular quality can only just getting had by the determining what a metaphor are and you will what an analogous name’s. Ways to these types of issues should permit us to see the frequently conflicting statements out-of Aquinas.